[cabfpub] Naming rules

[Ryan Sleevi]

While I appreciate the goal-oriented approach, as we've seen from the past
decade of Forum operation, without accompanying the what with the how, we
end up not accomplishing either.

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Moudrick M. Dadashov via Public <
public at cabforum.org> wrote:

> Right, there maybe other confusing cases that's whš I think we should just
> require (what) uniqueness instead of locality/state (how).
>
> Thanks,
> M.D.
>
>
> Sent from Samsung tablet.
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public <public at cabforum.org>
> Date: 3/22/17 15:20 (GMT+01:00)
> To: public at cabforum.org
> Cc: Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr>
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Naming rules
>
> If both companies "ABC" are located in the same city, then with current
> rules, there will be a DN collision, right? I don't think you can avoid
> that with the current BRs.
>
> Dimitris.
>
> On 22/3/2017 3:56 μμ, Jeremy Rowley via Public wrote:
>
> Correct. For #5 to be true, #3 must be true (which is still unclear), and
> OV must represent jurisdiction of incorporation (which it doesn’t).
>
>
>
> *From:* Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com <sleevi at google.com>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:33 AM
> *To:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> <public at cabforum.org>
> *Cc:* Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org> <gerv at mozilla.org>; Jeremy
> Rowley <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com> <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Naming rules
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Jeremy Rowley via Public <
> public at cabforum.org> wrote:
>
> There's one important item that seems unclear to me. What I took from
> reading Li Chun's message:
>
> 1)      Taiwan has a country-level registration
> 2)      Taiwan has a city-level registration
> 3)      The two are not mutually exclusive (ie ABC Company at the country
> level might be a completely different entity than ABC Company at the city
> level)
> 4)      You want the BRs to distinguish whether the ABC Company was
> registered with the country of Taiwan vs. a city registration.
> 5)      If locality is included in a cert, the actions of ABC Company
> (country) could be falsely attributed to the ABC Company (local)
>
> I can't tell if #3 is true. If it is, then I can see why we'd want to make
> the change. If #3 is not true, then the change is only for convenience in
> Taiwan.
>
>
>
> #5 is true if and only if we view OV information to indicate jurisdiction
> of incorporation. If it indicates physical address, then #5 is not true,
> correct?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing listPublic at cabforum.orghttps://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170322/59354a78/attachment-0003.html>