[cabfpub] Naming rules

[Moudrick M. Dadashov]

Right, there maybe other confusing cases that's whš I think we should just require (what) uniqueness instead of locality/state (how).
Thanks,M.D.

Sent from Samsung tablet.
-------- Original message --------From: Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public <public at cabforum.org> Date: 3/22/17  15:20  (GMT+01:00) To: public at cabforum.org Cc: Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Naming rules 

    If both companies "ABC" are located in the same city, then with
    current rules, there will be a DN collision, right? I don't think
    you can avoid that with the current BRs.

    

    Dimitris.

    

    On 22/3/2017 3:56 μμ, Jeremy Rowley via
      Public wrote:

    
    
      
      
      <!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
	{mso-style-name:msonormal;
	mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
	margin-right:0in;
	mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
	margin-left:0in;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
	{mso-style-type:personal;
	font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
	color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
	color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
	{page:WordSection1;}
-->
      
        Correct.
            For #5 to be true, #3 must be true (which is still unclear),
            and OV must represent jurisdiction of incorporation (which
            it doesn’t). 
         
        
        From:
            Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com] 

            Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:33 AM

            To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
            <public at cabforum.org>

            Cc: Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org>; Jeremy
            Rowley <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com>

            Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Naming rules
         
        
           
          
             
            
              On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:30 AM,
                Jeremy Rowley via Public <public at cabforum.org>
                wrote:
              
                There's one important item that
                  seems unclear to me. What I took from reading Li
                  Chun's message:

                  

                  1)      Taiwan has a country-level registration

                  2)      Taiwan has a city-level registration

                  3)      The two are not mutually exclusive (ie ABC
                  Company at the country level might be a completely
                  different entity than ABC Company at the city level)

                  4)      You want the BRs to distinguish whether the
                  ABC Company was registered with the country of Taiwan
                  vs. a city registration.

                  5)      If locality is included in a cert, the actions
                  of ABC Company (country) could be falsely attributed
                  to the ABC Company (local)

                  

                  I can't tell if #3 is true. If it is, then I can see
                  why we'd want to make the change. If #3 is not true,
                  then the change is only for convenience in Taiwan.
              
              
                 
              
              
                #5 is true if and only if we view
                  OV information to indicate jurisdiction of
                  incorporation. If it indicates physical address, then
                  #5 is not true, correct? 
              
            
             
          
        
      
      

      
      

      _______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

    
    

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170322/7f7fd7fd/attachment-0003.html>