[cabf_validation] Fwd: [Acme] Protocol Action: 'ACME TLS ALPN Challenge Extension' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-07.txt)
wthayer at mozilla.com
Thu Oct 17 17:54:35 MST 2019
Should we go ahead now and replace method 10 with this?
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:32 PM
Subject: [Acme] Protocol Action: 'ACME TLS ALPN Challenge Extension' to
Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-07.txt)
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce at ietf.org>
Cc: <rdd at cert.org>, <cpu at letsencrypt.org>, <acme at ietf.org>, <
draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn at ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg at ietf.org>, <
acme-chairs at ietf.org>, <rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org>
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'ACME TLS ALPN Challenge Extension'
(draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-07.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Automated Certificate Management
Environment Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Benjamin Kaduk and Roman Danyliw.
A URL of this Internet Draft is:
The ACME-TLS-ALPN draft extends the Automatic Certificate Management
(ACME) with a new domain validation challenge type (tls-alpn-01) that can be
performed at the TLS layer alone. This challenge type meets the need of
(hosting providers, CDNs, etc) who wish to prove authorization of a DNS
identifier without modifying HTTP handling behaviour or updating DNS zone
This is the spiritual successor to the deprecated/removed TLS-SNI-01/02
challenge types from earlier ACME drafts.
Working Group Summary
There is WG consensus on the document
Earlier drafts specified a id-pe-acmeIdentifier OID that was already
IANA. This has been addressed in the latest draft. The ASN.1 format of the
id-pe-acmeIdentifier was also both simplified (removing an unneeded subarc
the OID) and clarified (to emphasize the SHA-256 digest value).
Let's Encrypt, a high-volume ACME based CA, has fully implemented the
tls-alpn-01 challenge type and has been issuing certificates in production
this challenge type since July 12th, 2018. Multiple independent ACME clients
have implemented support for this challenge type.
The overall document quality is high. Developing an implementation based on
specification text is reasonable. Interoperable client/server
exist and are in use in a production setting.
The document shepard is Daniel McCarney.
The responsible area director is Roman Danyliw.
Acme mailing list
Acme at ietf.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Validation