[cabf_validation] Using 3.2.2.4.2/.3 for future domains

[Wayne Thayer]

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>
wrote:

>
>
> If it’s something we want to allow
>

Do you believe this isn't currently permitted by the BRs, or are you
suggesting that we might want to forbid it?

, I think we want to articulate a clear set of principles that can be
> applied across all of the validation methods where this sort of thing is
> possible, instead of working piecemeal on each one.  The mistake we made
> last time, I think, was not working from a common set of general principles
> when writing and evaluating each validation method.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180320/e1f6a9f7/attachment.html>