[cabf_validation] Using 220.127.116.11.2/.3 for future domains
wthayer at mozilla.com
Tue Mar 20 14:43:14 MST 2018
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>
> If it’s something we want to allow
Do you believe this isn't currently permitted by the BRs, or are you
suggesting that we might want to forbid it?
, I think we want to articulate a clear set of principles that can be
> applied across all of the validation methods where this sort of thing is
> possible, instead of working piecemeal on each one. The mistake we made
> last time, I think, was not working from a common set of general principles
> when writing and evaluating each validation method.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Validation