[cabf_validation] Issues for next Validation Working Group call
realsky at cht.com.tw
Tue Oct 11 18:15:08 MST 2016
For topic (2), I found https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/Object%20Registry
Certificate OID Value
This extension will be marked critical in Test Certificates to render them
invalid for browser use
From: Validation [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Kirk
Hall via Validation
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 6:28 AM
To: 'validation (validation at cabforum.org)'
Subject: [cabf_validation] Issues for next Validation Working Group call
Here are some issues from the Sept. 15 CABF call for the VWG to consider. I
know there are other issues also. Dean says there is no time for a VWG
meeting at the F2F next week, so we should consider on our next call.
Did we find an alternative time for future calls?
(1) Updating BR 22.214.171.124 (IP Address verification) to match Ballot 169. Doug
had sent an email suggesting the validation methods for IP addresses in BR
126.96.36.199 be updated as appropriate to match the new validation methods for
domain names in BR 188.8.131.52. Gerv agreed, and suggested the issue be sent to
the Validation Working Group. Kirk will make this request to Jeremy Rowley,
who was not on the call.
(2) OID needed for Test Certificate under Ballot 169. Dimitris pointed out
that the new definition of Test Certificate under Ballot 169 called for the
CA to include “a critical extension with the specified Test Certificate
CABF OID” in the Test Certificates. Kirk asked if this was meant to be a
single Test Certificate OID used by all CAs, or one unique to each CA.
Dimitris said the natural interpretation was a single CABF OID used by all
CAs, and thought the Validation Working Group should get an OID assigned.
Doug agreed. Kirk noted the Validation Working Group recently became
inactive, but that he would talk to Jeremy Rowley about scheduling new
From: validation-bounces at cabforum.org
[mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Dean Coclin
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 2:13 PM
To: validation (validation at cabforum.org) <validation at cabforum.org>
Subject: [cabf_validation] Validation Working Group Call
Does the Validation working group want to take the Code signing time slot
which is Noon Eastern time tomorrow?
Code Signing has no meetings scheduled right now so you can conceivably take
Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also, please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to ensure the information security and to protect personal information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Validation