[cabfpub] Naming rules

[Dimitris Zacharopoulos]

If both companies "ABC" are located in the same city, then with current 
rules, there will be a DN collision, right? I don't think you can avoid 
that with the current BRs.

Dimitris.

On 22/3/2017 3:56 μμ, Jeremy Rowley via Public wrote:
>
> Correct. For #5 to be true, #3 must be true (which is still unclear), 
> and OV must represent jurisdiction of incorporation (which it doesn’t).
>
> *From:*Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:33 AM
> *To:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Cc:* Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org>; Jeremy Rowley 
> <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Naming rules
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Jeremy Rowley via Public 
> <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org>> wrote:
>
>     There's one important item that seems unclear to me. What I took
>     from reading Li Chun's message:
>
>     1)      Taiwan has a country-level registration
>     2)      Taiwan has a city-level registration
>     3)      The two are not mutually exclusive (ie ABC Company at the
>     country level might be a completely different entity than ABC
>     Company at the city level)
>     4)      You want the BRs to distinguish whether the ABC Company
>     was registered with the country of Taiwan vs. a city registration.
>     5)      If locality is included in a cert, the actions of ABC
>     Company (country) could be falsely attributed to the ABC Company
>     (local)
>
>     I can't tell if #3 is true. If it is, then I can see why we'd want
>     to make the change. If #3 is not true, then the change is only for
>     convenience in Taiwan.
>
> #5 is true if and only if we view OV information to indicate 
> jurisdiction of incorporation. If it indicates physical address, then 
> #5 is not true, correct?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170322/1803ec58/attachment-0003.html>