[cabfpub] [EXT] Re: Naming rules

[Tarah Wheeler]

On #3: in fact, the state level seems to be of concern (not cities/countries), since there can be 50 different ABC, LLCs—one for each US state. It adds an additional level of complexity.


--
Tarah M. Wheeler

Principal Security Advocate and Sr Director of Engineering - Website Security -
Delivering Confidence for Customers and Consumers by Securing Websites and Applications
Symantec Corporation
www.symantec.com<http://www.symantec.com/>
________________________________
(206) 276-4920
tarah at symantec.com
________________________________
[cid:80D075AE-6B8B-499F-8E1B-3F9E8C3EC238]<http://www.symantec.com/>
________________________________

This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication.

From: Public <public-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org>> on behalf of Jeremy Rowley via Public <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
Reply-To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
Date: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 9:56 AM
To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com<mailto:sleevi at google.com>>, CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
Cc: Jeremy Rowley <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com<mailto:jeremy.rowley at digicert.com>>
Subject: [EXT] Re: [cabfpub] Naming rules

Correct. For #5 to be true, #3 must be true (which is still unclear), and OV must represent jurisdiction of incorporation (which it doesn’t).

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:33 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
Cc: Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org<mailto:gerv at mozilla.org>>; Jeremy Rowley <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com<mailto:jeremy.rowley at digicert.com>>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Naming rules



On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Jeremy Rowley via Public <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>> wrote:
There's one important item that seems unclear to me. What I took from reading Li Chun's message:

1)      Taiwan has a country-level registration
2)      Taiwan has a city-level registration
3)      The two are not mutually exclusive (ie ABC Company at the country level might be a completely different entity than ABC Company at the city level)
4)      You want the BRs to distinguish whether the ABC Company was registered with the country of Taiwan vs. a city registration.
5)      If locality is included in a cert, the actions of ABC Company (country) could be falsely attributed to the ABC Company (local)

I can't tell if #3 is true. If it is, then I can see why we'd want to make the change. If #3 is not true, then the change is only for convenience in Taiwan.

#5 is true if and only if we view OV information to indicate jurisdiction of incorporation. If it indicates physical address, then #5 is not true, correct?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170322/0380b81a/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 7EDF6DD6-B748-44E0-A644-5EEFE097D244.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5688 bytes
Desc: 7EDF6DD6-B748-44E0-A644-5EEFE097D244.png
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170322/0380b81a/attachment-0003.png>