[cabfpub] C=GR, C=UK exceptions in BRs

[Kirk Hall]

I answered your questions in previous emails.  I would like to understand better the factors you believe should allow deviation from a published standard – that will help with this discussion.

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 5:24 PM
To: Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>; Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] C=GR, C=UK exceptions in BRs



On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com<mailto:Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>> wrote:
Ryan – you raise a good point.  Is it ever right to deviate from published industry standards, even for good cause?

Hi Kirk,

I did not raise that point. While I appreciate you wanting to discuss this point, it's not relevant to the question I must again ask you:

For this specific case of deviating from ISO 3166, can you articulate why you believe it useful to deviate? Do you disagree with the assessment of risks? Do you believe they are not issues? Do you believe identity information in certificates is useful?

I appreciate your thoughtful consideration to these simple questions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170318/e5576019/attachment-0003.html>