[cabfpub] Results on Ballot 187 - Make CAA Checking Mandatory

[Ryan Sleevi]

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Phill <hallam at gmail.com> wrote:

> All I actually want here is to get folk to agree here on what they think
> the document should try to say so I know whether to submit an errata or ask
> the existing errata be rolled out in a new document.
>
> And I would like that before I meet with people in Chicago.
>

I totally understand and appreciate that - but why does it require holding
off on a follow-up ballot, given the independence of these two?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170309/a75c951b/attachment-0002.html>