[cabfpub] Ballot process ordering

[Ryan Sleevi]

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
wrote:

> Go back and read my message, Ryan – I asked why you never raised this
> point in the many emails and teleconferences *before* the F2F on the
> procedure we would follow.  And you didn’t raise these issues at the F2F
> either.
>

This is not accurate.


> As to what was discussed at the F2F – the Minutes for this issue were
> drafted by Billy van Cannon, and are posted on the CABF wiki, but have not
> yet been approved for publication.  But is recommend you read Billy’s draft
> Minutes – they do not support your position.
>

Yes, they're still draft minutes.

To the point of keeping accurate minutes - and why full recordings may be
desirable, in the future, to avoid such misrepresentations, recall the
definition of "Contribution" in the IPR Policy:
"For a verbal contribution to be deemed a Contribution hereunder it must be
memorialized within approved meeting minutes of the CAB Forum."

If a minute taker fails to accurately note a proposal, and it's not
incorporated into the minutes (*either* the minutes of a WG or the Forum at
large), but is incorporated into a Guideline, may not trigger any of our IP
protections.

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20161102/0da9c364/attachment-0003.html>