[cabf_validation] Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration Updates

[Adriano Santoni]

All,

I have a couple doubts after reading [1]:

1) I cannot seem to find an explicit requirement that a CA uses at least 
two (2) Remote Network Perspectives. That can be inferred from the 
Quorum Requirements table in 3.2.2.9, sure, but it would probably be 
better (IMO) if it was explicit.

2) The current proposed language has it that Remote Network Perspectives 
must be "distinct from the Primary Network Perspective" (meaning they 
must be at least 500km away from it), but it doesn't say that they must 
also be "distinct" from each other! Although this is intuitable, IMO it 
would be better to clarify.

[1] 
https://github.com/ryancdickson/staging/blob/require-mpdv-v2/docs/BR.md#3229-multi-perspective-issuance-corroboration

Adriano

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20231023/c9d58255/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4620 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20231023/c9d58255/attachment.p7s>