[cabf_validation] Definition of "control" of a domain or IP address

[Ryan Sleevi]

Thanks for clarifying, Adriano.

I suspect any definition added to 1.6.1 is going to be circular, at best
(e.g. "See 3.2.2.4 / 3.2.2.5"), or misinterpreted as being limiting, as
unfortunately is so often the trend.

Perhaps you could help understand where or how this practically impacts? I
can think of a number of operational requirements that, similar to control
of a domain / IP address, be argued as definitions, but worry that, like
here, that would only further muddy things.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:28 AM Adriano Santoni <
adriano.santoni at staff.aruba.it> wrote:

> I was referring to the Definitions in §1.6.1.
>
> Sections 3.2.2.4 and 3.2.2.5 provide, in a way, an operational definition
> of having control of a domain or IP address, but assume that the general
> notion is known a priori.
>
> I'd like a theoretical definition to be present in §1.6.1, although I
> admit that it's not strictly necessary.
>
> Adriano
>
>
> Il 16/11/2020 17:30, Ryan Sleevi ha scritto:
>
> I believe the definition is "3.2.2.4 / 3.2.2.5"
>
> Am I overlooking something to your question?
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:59 AM Adriano Santoni via Validation <
> validation at cabforum.org> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> If I am not mistaken, we do not have an express definition of "control"
>> (of a domain or IP address) in the BR.
>>
>> Is it because a definition is not deemed necessary or because it was
>> overlooked?
>>
>> (or maybe it's there and I am just not seeing it! I hope not...)
>>
>> Adriano
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Validation mailing list
>> Validation at cabforum.org
>> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/validation
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20201117/af5420e4/attachment.html>