[cabf_validation] [EXTERNAL]Re: Making progress on disclosures of data sources

[Kirk Hall]

Ha, Sweden. Which one is the correct registry to use?

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 5:26:14 PM
To: Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
Cc: CA/Browser Forum Validation SC List <validation at cabforum.org>; Doug Beattie <doug.beattie at globalsign.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Making progress on disclosures of data sources

WARNING: This email originated outside of Entrust Datacard.
DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.
________________________________


On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 7:10 PM Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com<mailto:Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>> wrote:

OK, you have answered our question – you don’t have any concrete examples you can provide of actual cases where a CA used an “improper” government registry data source to validate the corporate registry number and existence of the Subject in an EV certificate.

I very specifically provided actual cases where a CA used improper government registry data sources to validate the corporate registry number and existence of a Subject. Search for Bolagsverket
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20200423/70084ca4/attachment.html>