[cabf_validation] Agenda

Doug Beattie doug.beattie at globalsign.com
Thu Jan 17 08:55:44 MST 2019

I'll volunteer to write a ballot to remove method 9.  I think the update to
10 should be a different ballot.


From: Validation <validation-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Bruce Morton
via Validation
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 4:18 PM
To: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>; CA/Browser Forum Validation
WG List <validation at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabf_validation] Agenda


Should we discuss removal of Method 9 and the change to Method 10? I think
these items should be escalated as there are security issues which have not
been addressed in the BRs.




From: Validation [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Tim
Hollebeek via Validation
Sent: January 16, 2019 3:55 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabf_validation] Agenda



1.	Ballot SC14: Phone validation
2.	Ballot SC7: IP Validation
3.	Continue work on Method 6 ballot
4.	Any other business.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20190117/159dfb7b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5701 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20190117/159dfb7b/attachment-0001.p7s>

More information about the Validation mailing list