[cabf_validation] IDN Encoding Ballot
Tim Hollebeek
tim.hollebeek at digicert.com
Wed Feb 13 13:40:21 MST 2019
Sure.
From: Validation <validation-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer
via Validation
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 11:50 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org>
Subject: [cabf_validation] IDN Encoding Ballot
The recent debate [1] [2] over IDNA2003 vs IDNA2008 encoding motivated me to
take a stab at fixing the problem. Here is a draft ballot based on Peter
Bowen's Ballot 202:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RHb9lGfe70uh6UcHg96OM7dewv9tFhi1-ZMXgDUbBi0/edit?usp=sharing
My thanks to Corey Bonnell and Roland Shoemaker for their input.
Can we add this to tomorrow''s VWG meeting agenda?
The big open question is if we should forbid IDNA2003 encoding in
certificates.
Thanks,
Wayne
[1] https://cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2019-January/000520.html
[2]
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/ad6NfLGZ730/9yTm3iJgFAAJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20190213/cabc7dda/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20190213/cabc7dda/attachment.p7s>
More information about the Validation
mailing list