[cabf_validation] IDN Encoding Ballot

[Tim Hollebeek]

Sure.



From: Validation <validation-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer 
via Validation
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 11:50 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org>
Subject: [cabf_validation] IDN Encoding Ballot



The recent debate [1] [2] over IDNA2003 vs IDNA2008 encoding motivated me to 
take a stab at fixing the problem. Here is a draft ballot based on Peter 
Bowen's Ballot 202:



https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RHb9lGfe70uh6UcHg96OM7dewv9tFhi1-ZMXgDUbBi0/edit?usp=sharing



My thanks to Corey Bonnell and Roland Shoemaker for their input.



Can we add this to tomorrow''s VWG meeting agenda?



The big open question is if we should forbid IDNA2003 encoding in 
certificates.



Thanks,



Wayne



[1] https://cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2019-January/000520.html

[2] 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/ad6NfLGZ730/9yTm3iJgFAAJ



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20190213/cabc7dda/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20190213/cabc7dda/attachment.p7s>