[cabf_validation] Proposal for Adding RDAP

Corey Bonnell CBonnell at trustwave.com
Thu May 3 06:48:02 MST 2018


Hi Wayne,
I believe the two RFCs referenced in the WHOIS definition need to be added to section 1.6.3.

Otherwise, the ballot text looks good.

Thanks,
Corey


From: Validation <validation-bounces at cabforum.org> on behalf of Wayne Thayer via Validation <validation at cabforum.org>
Reply-To: Wayne Thayer <wthayer at mozilla.com>, CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org>
Date: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 at 7:04 PM
Cc: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabf_validation] Proposal for Adding RDAP

The proposal stands at:


— MOTION BEGINS –

This ballot modifies the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates” as follows, based upon Version 1.5.6:

In section 1.6.1, add the following definition:

WHOIS: information retrieved directly from the Domain Name Registrar or registry operator via the protocol defined in RFC 3912, the Registry Data Access Protocol defined in RFC 7482, or an HTTPS website.
— MOTION ENDS –

Are there more comments, or two endorsers?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180503/391e4c9c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Validation mailing list