[cabf_validation] Validation WG: Do we need a plan?

[Tim Hollebeek]

I'm going to send out an agenda on Tuesday, but I'd like to send out
something for people to provide feedback and comment on first.  We only have
five hours of discussion before the next forum meeting: March 29, April 12,
April 26, May 10, and May 24.

 

The discussion on the last call was great, but my personal feeling was that
open ended discussions like that could easily consume all five hours without
reaching a conclusion.

 

I'd like to hear comments on how we can structure the discussion to make
sure we are productively using our time.  There's a lot of demand for VWG
working group time right now because there are several high priority items,
and I personally feel like I'm going to have to be a bit more aggressive
about cutting of tangents and time-boxing discussions in order to keeping us
moving forward.

 

I rarely get comments either before or after the agenda is posted, and I
want to make sure we keep up the momentum from the Validation Summit, so I'd
like to hear comments on how we make sure we do that.

 

-Tim

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180323/3c7a152b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180323/3c7a152b/attachment.p7s>