[cabf_validation] Outline of Method 1 Replacement
wthayer at mozilla.com
Fri Mar 9 12:22:34 MST 2018
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Jonathan Rudenberg <jonathan at titanous.com>
> Is there a compelling reason to bring back a new version of this method?
Yes, we're asking the same question.
It seems like any modification that adds the appropriate security
> properties would bring it very close to 22.214.171.124.2 / 126.96.36.199.3. Based on my
> understanding of the use of this method in the wild, it makes more sense to
> me for CAs to switch to .2 and .3 for domain ownership authorization and
> then do necessary additional subject validation with 188.8.131.52 or EVGL 11.8.3.
The obvious example to me is when the CA is already performing EV
validation, in which case this could save a step. There are also cases
where having a contractual relationship could make this method appealing to
a CA. In general, while I see your point, I'm trying not to make
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Validation