[cabf_validation] Proposed Update to EV to include OrganisationIdentifier as per ETSI standard

[Tim Hollebeek]

I’ll buy that.

 

-Tim

 

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 11:35 AM
To: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>
Cc: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org>; Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr>
Subject: Re: [cabf_validation] Proposed Update to EV to include OrganisationIdentifier as per ETSI standard

 

 

 

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com <mailto:tim.hollebeek at digicert.com> > wrote:

I think it can be encoded in qcStatements or something similar, and I have encouraged the ETSI and qualified cert folks to consider options like that going forward.  At this point, though, that would require them changing their standards, and as we all know, that can take a while.

 

>From the presentation, however, it was clear that this current use is relegated to non-public-trust, and they were exploring this for public trust. Thus, I think it's reasonable to state that public trust has a different degree of expectation, and such changes can and should be expected for public trust.

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180611/6120b936/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180611/6120b936/attachment.p7s>