[cabf_validation] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5

[Doug Beattie]

<Moved to Validation WG list>

Tim, I'm surprised you posted this to the public list when several CAs expressed concern over removing method 1 and this was on our agenda to discuss tomorrow.  Why did we jump the gun here?

From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Tim Hollebeek via Public
Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:22 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: [cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5


Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5

Purpose of Ballot: Section 3.2.2.4 says that it "defines the permitted processes and procedures for validating the Applicant's ownership or control of the domain."  Most of the validation methods actually do validate ownership and control, but two do not, and can be completed solely based on an applicant's own assertions.

Since these two validation methods do not meet the objectives of section 3.2.2.4, and are actively being used to avoid validating domain control or ownership, they should be removed, and the other methods that do validate domain control or ownership should be used.

The following motion has been proposed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and endorsed by Ryan Sleevi of Google and Rich Smith of Comodo.

-- MOTION BEGINS -

This ballot modifies the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" as follows, based upon Version 1.5.4:

In Section 3.2.2.4.1, add text at the end: "For certificates issued on or after March 1, 2018, this method SHALL NOT be used for validation, and completed validations using this method SHALL NOT be used for the issuance of certificates."

In Section 3.2.2.4.5, add text at the end: "For certificates issued on or after March 1, 2018, this method SHALL NOT be used for validation, and completed validations using this method SHALL NOT be used for the issuance of certificates."

In Section 4.2.1, after the paragraph that begins "After the change to any validation method", add the following paragraph: "Validations completed using methods specified in Section 3.2.2.4.1 or Section 3.2.2.4.5 SHALL NOT be re-used on or after March 1, 2018."

-- MOTION ENDS -

For the purposes of section 4.2.1, the new text added to 4.2.1 from this ballot is "specifically provided in a [this] ballot."

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7+ days)
  Start Time: 2017-01-03  19:30:00 UTC
  End Time: Not Before 2017-01-10 19:30:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)
  Start Time: TBD
  End Time: TBD

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 17564 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180103/6eec356f/attachment-0001.bin>