[cabf_validation] [EXTERNAL]Re: Ballot Proposal: Validation Method in certificatePolicies
wthayer at mozilla.com
Wed Aug 15 09:55:27 MST 2018
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 9:40 AM Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:
> Just checking if I understand:
> Are you suggesting folding the document into a single section (that is,
> combining 184.108.40.206 and 220.127.116.11)?
Not necessarily, although that could work. I'm asking how you think this
should be implemented.
> Could you explain what the concerns would be for the alternative solution,
> which is just, within each section, e.g. 18.104.22.168.1
> This ID of this validation method is 1.
That is what I'm suggesting. Moreover, I want to get some general sense of
how to implement this before drafting the language.
> That is, I'd like to try to understand a bit more the desire for a need
> for a separate mapping table, and how the existence or absence of alignment
> between the document and the identifiers helps or hinders the use cases you
> envisage for this.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Validation