[cabf_validation] IP address ballot

[Tim Hollebeek]

Sorry I couldn't make the call; I had a conflicting meeting I couldn't skip.

Has the WG discussed my problems with 3.2.2.5.4 (and potentially 3.2.2.5.5) ?  Because of the differences between how DNS works for IPs versus names, I'm now somewhat reluctant we should allow them, but would like to hear other's opinions.

-Tim

From: Validation [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Rowley via Validation
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 11:24 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List
Cc: Jeremy Rowley
Subject: [cabf_validation] IP address ballot



________________________________

This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20170309/54ffa51f/attachment.html>