[cabf_validation] Gerv's ballot

[Rick Andrews]

Thanks, Wayne. I might volunteer to create that unified ballot, but not
right now. I will be OOO part or all of the next two weeks, and that's a bad
time to not respond quickly to comments and questions. 

 

-Rick

 

From: Wayne Thayer [mailto:wthayer at godaddy.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 5:58 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org>
Cc: Rick Andrews <Rick_Andrews at symantec.com>
Subject: RE: Gerv's ballot

 

It was a suggestion, not a ballot:
https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2017-January/009250.html

 

Thanks,

 

Wayne

 

From: Validation [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Rick
Andrews via Validation
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 6:16 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org
<mailto:validation at cabforum.org> >
Cc: Rick Andrews <Rick_Andrews at symantec.com
<mailto:Rick_Andrews at symantec.com> >
Subject: [cabf_validation] Gerv's ballot

 

At our VWG this week, we talked about the "errata" ballot I proposed, and
someone suggested it might be good to piggyback it on Gerv's ballot. Now
that I'm finally caught up on email, I don't see a ballot from him other
than the CAA ballot, which isn't appropriate for this. Can someone direct me
to the intended ballot?

-Rick

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20170214/fa80a519/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5725 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20170214/fa80a519/attachment-0001.bin>