[cabf_validation] Validation Method Revisions - Ballot 169

Ben Wilson ben.wilson at digicert.com
Fri Jun 24 09:18:15 MST 2016


Here are the  changes I received from Jeremy based on our discussions during
the  F2F in Bilbao.  Plus I inserted the  footnote on examples of Request
Tokens previously omitted per Question 2 below.

 

https://github.com/cabforum/documents/commit/397d7ce42c29583179848a0af61539e
04758feb6 

 

From: validation-bounces at cabforum.org
[mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 2:53 PM
To: validation at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabf_validation] Validation Method Revisions - Ballot 169

 

All,

 

I created a branch, but then realized that  Peter already had one, so I made
a change to his version -  see
https://github.com/cabforum/documents/commit/ed50ab8394f6c006896d478e721063b
96da8769d 

 

Question 1 - this doesn't include any changes made at the  face-to-face,
were there any?

 

Question 2 - I noticed that  the examples of  Request Tokens (at the bottom
of the document "Domain Validation WG Proposal") aren't in this draft.
Shouldn't they be?

 

Ben

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20160624/7db242f7/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4954 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20160624/7db242f7/attachment.bin 


More information about the Validation mailing list