[cabf_validation] Question before we start Ballot 169
doug.beattie at globalsign.com
Thu Jul 21 12:54:02 MST 2016
Ignore that last email as you have already answered it. This one appeared as the most recent in my mail client, so it must have been stuck in our mail filter longer than the others....
From: Doug Beattie
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 3:50 PM
To: 'Kirk Hall'; validation (validation at cabforum.org)
Subject: RE: Question before we start Ballot 169
I'd suggest not changing the ballot now, go with it. GlobalSIgn was one endorser, maybe Trustwave was the other? DigiCert as the author.
From: validation-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 2:38 PM
To: validation (validation at cabforum.org)
Subject: [cabf_validation] Question before we start Ballot 169
On the call today, there were no objections to starting Ballot 169, so I guess we can.
Ben - the most recent Ballot 169 draft doesn't list the proposer and endorsers. Do you remember who that was?
Question: I just noticed that the Ballot (and existing BR 188.8.131.52) uses the term Domain Name System about six times total, but it is not included in our Definitions. (I see we list DNS as an acronym for Domain Name System, and it's pretty well defined outside of the BRs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System )
Do we care? Or just go with the Ballot as written now?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Validation