[cabf_validation] [cabfpub] CAB Forum WG Draft

[Peter Bowen]

I’m assuming the change is to remove ", except that a CA MAY NOT verify a domain using the procedure described subsection 3.2.2.4(7).”, right?

> On Apr 13, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Jeremy Rowley <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree. I don’t see a reason not to cover the changes in a single ballot.
>   <>
> From: kirk_hall at trendmicro.com <mailto:kirk_hall at trendmicro.com> [mailto:kirk_hall at trendmicro.com <mailto:kirk_hall at trendmicro.com>] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 4:08 PM
> To: Doug Beattie; Jeremy Rowley
> Cc: validation (validation at cabforum.org <mailto:validation at cabforum.org>)
> Subject: RE: [cabfpub] CAB Forum WG Draft
>  
> In the past, some have said “we should never have changes to the BRs and changes to the EVGL in the same ballot”, but I strongly disagree – if the changes are related, why not have on one ballot for simplicity?
>  
> From: validation-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org>] On Behalf Of Doug Beattie
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 10:21 AM
> To: Jeremy Rowley
> Cc: validation (validation at cabforum.org <mailto:validation at cabforum.org>)
> Subject: Re: [cabf_validation] [cabfpub] CAB Forum WG Draft
>  
> Reply posted to Validation WG: 
>  
> Jeremy – is it necessary to have an EV ballot or change accompany this ballot, if so, do we need to prepare that also and somehow link them or combine them?
> 
> Doug
>  
> From: public-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org>] On Behalf Of Jeremy Rowley
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 1:01 PM
> To: public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org>
> Subject: [cabfpub] CAB Forum WG Draft
>  
> Attached is the WG approved version of the domain validation ballot. Unless there are new thoughts on the proposal, we plan to move this version forward to a ballot. 
>  
> Thanks!
> Jeremy
>  
> TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
> The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential 
> and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. 
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or 
> disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
> telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Validation mailing list
> Validation at cabforum.org <mailto:Validation at cabforum.org>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/validation <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/validation>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20160413/e0640bb1/attachment-0001.html