[cabf_validation] [cabfpub] CAB Forum WG Draft

[kirk_hall at trendmicro.com]

In the past, some have said "we should never have changes to the BRs and changes to the EVGL in the same ballot", but I strongly disagree - if the changes are related, why not have on one ballot for simplicity?

From: validation-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Doug Beattie
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 10:21 AM
To: Jeremy Rowley
Cc: validation (validation at cabforum.org)
Subject: Re: [cabf_validation] [cabfpub] CAB Forum WG Draft

Reply posted to Validation WG:

Jeremy - is it necessary to have an EV ballot or change accompany this ballot, if so, do we need to prepare that also and somehow link them or combine them?

Doug

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Rowley
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 1:01 PM
To: public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>
Subject: [cabfpub] CAB Forum WG Draft

Attached is the WG approved version of the domain validation ballot. Unless there are new thoughts on the proposal, we plan to move this version forward to a ballot.

Thanks!
Jeremy

<table class="TM_EMAIL_NOTICE"><tr><td><pre>
TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential 
and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or 
disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
</pre></td></tr></table>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20160413/55d9ab9f/attachment.html