[cabf_validation] Port Numbers for HTTP

[Ben Wilson]

Maybe I’ll mention my question on the current CABF call, and see if anyone has any ideas.

 

From: validation-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:29 AM
To: Richard Barnes <rbarnes at mozilla.com>
Cc: validation at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabf_validation] Port Numbers for HTTP

 

Is there a way to describe these without enumerating them?

 

From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rbarnes at mozilla.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:25 AM
To: Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com <mailto:ben.wilson at digicert.com> >
Cc: validation at cabforum.org <mailto:validation at cabforum.org> 
Subject: Re: Port Numbers for HTTP

 

It got trapped in my work flow :P

I scanned through the IANA port number registry, and tagged port numbers below 1024 that appear to either (1) support TLS, or (2) use HTTP.  The full list is in this Google spreadsheet:


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lEyvYEvrqCYU15xvt7eP3W378Y6PN0qU_xj7unp7rYo/edit?usp=sharing

The short answer is that there aren't really any exotic ports that use HTTP, but there are several that use TLS.

--Richard

 

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com <mailto:ben.wilson at digicert.com> > wrote:

Were you going to send a list of port numbers for HTTP?  

 

Maybe you did and they got trapped in my spam filter or somehow they were lost.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20150723/4bceae02/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4954 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20150723/4bceae02/attachment.bin