[Servercert-wg] Servercert-wg Digest, Vol 75, Issue 25
Peter Miškovič
Peter.Miskovic at disig.sk
Mon Sep 23 07:06:05 UTC 2024
Disig votes "YES" on Ballot SC-078 - Subject organizationName alignment for DBA / Assumed Name
Regards
Peter Miskovic
-----Original Message-----
From: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of servercert-wg-request at cabforum.org
Sent: utorok 17. septembra 2024 15:20
To: servercert-wg at cabforum.org
Subject: Servercert-wg Digest, Vol 75, Issue 25
Send Servercert-wg mailing list submissions to
servercert-wg at cabforum.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
servercert-wg-request at cabforum.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
servercert-wg-owner at cabforum.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Servercert-wg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Voting Period Begins: Ballot SC-078 - Subject
organizationName alignment for DBA / Assumed Name (Martijn Katerbarg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:19:55 +0000
From: Martijn Katerbarg <martijn.katerbarg at sectigo.com>
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
<servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: Ballot SC-078 - Subject
organizationName alignment for DBA / Assumed Name
Message-ID:
<SA1PR17MB65031F92B4CB3E5F09D88C3BE3612 at SA1PR17MB6503.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
?Summary
The TLS Baseline Requirements currently state an OV certificate may contain either a DBA / Assumed Name or Legal Name. The EVGs and SBRs allow for the common format of "DBA (Legal Name)". This ballot aims to align the practices for OV certificates with this.
While still allowing the inclusion of the sole DBA / Assumed Name, it will also allow for the "DBA (Legal Name)" format to be used, allowing CAs to align practices with the EVG and SBRs.
The following motion has been proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Clint Wilson (Apple) and Enrico Entschew (D-Trust).
Motion Begins
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") based on Version 2.0.7 as specified in the following redline:
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/ba28d04894d69c8fac62850b9d0de5061658c7c5...d69373c35ff72121a912b69b060ff89f32d41383 <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fcompare%2Fba28d04894d69c8fac62850b9d0de5061658c7c5...d69373c35ff72121a912b69b060ff89f32d41383&data=05%7C02%7Cmartijn.katerbarg%40sectigo.com%7C1bdc97410>
Motion Ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (at least 7 days)
* Start time: 2024-09-10 13:00 UTC
* End time: 2024-09-17 13:20 UTC
Vote for approval (7 days)
* Start time: 2024-09-17 13:20 UTC
* End time: 2024-09-24 13:20 UTC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20240917/0e594360/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 8254 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20240917/0e594360/attachment.bin>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg at cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
------------------------------
End of Servercert-wg Digest, Vol 75, Issue 25
*********************************************
More information about the Servercert-wg
mailing list