[Servercert-wg] Renumbering of the NetSec Requirements

[Ben Wilson]

I suppose that the new headings would be normative.  The "discussion notes"
are found in the working document that reveals where this effort is headed
- intended to eventually end up.  It is here -  NetSec-Reorg -
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iXOEdsoUcshtS3VZh2jJ-qvSWLGl-DUWMyNs0uZBheI/edit?usp=sharing




On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:52 PM Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:

> Removing the cross-post, so folks don't get mail bounces or only see half
> the discussion, with replies inline.
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:56 PM Ben Wilson via Servercert-wg <
> servercert-wg at cabforum.org> wrote:
>
>> In order to move forward with an overhaul of the Network and Certificate
>> System Security Requirements, the Document Organization subgroup has
>> determined it best to break up the transitions into discrete
>> tasks/ballots.
>>
>
> Do you have a link to that discussion/minutes? Is there an overview? It's
> useful to have a 'big picture' view to understand where things are proposed
> for going, if only to help contextualize the smaller changes.
>
> Attached is a pdf that shows the first step in a proposed
>> restructuring/renumbering of the NetSet requirements -- strictly
>> renumbering.
>>
>
> This doesn't seem  to be purely renumbering. For example, each of the
> section headers were renamed with statements, which are unclear if they're
> meant to be normative or informative, along with an orientation around
> principles. That seems to harken back to WebTrust/ISO 21188's approach to
> auditing, but it's unclear why this change. Is there more context for those
> renamings? Is this part of a broader effort, and if so, do you have a
> pointer to those past discussions?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20200113/7976a966/attachment.html>