[cabfpub] [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC14: CAA Contact Property and Associated Phone Validation Methods

[Bruce Morton]

Doug,

I would also endorse the ballot SC14 with method 3.2.2.4.16 removed. We can follow up with Method 16 later.

Bruce.

From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Doug Beattie via Servercert-wg
Sent: January 7, 2019 2:40 PM
To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Cc: public at cabforum.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC14: CAA Contact Property and Associated Phone Validation Methods

Ryan,
Sure, I can wait until that is done for Method 16 (3.2.2.4.16 Phone Contact with DNS CAA Phone Contact).  Would there be any objection to moving forward with this ballot with 3.2.2.4.16 as a placeholder and continuing with the other 2 methods?
Doug

From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com<mailto:sleevi at google.com>>
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 2:12 PM
To: Doug Beattie <doug.beattie at globalsign.com<mailto:doug.beattie at globalsign.com>>; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org<mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org>>
Cc: public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC14: CAA Contact Property and Associated Phone Validation Methods

Doug,

It may be useful to hold off on this Ballot until Tim has performed the necessary steps for IANA registration, which also involves the Expert Review. As captured from the ballot discussion, the 'original' or 'agreed' process was spec -> review -> allow, although ballot SC13 opted for spec+allow -> review instead. In both cases, however, IANA Expert Review is part of the process to completing the previous ballot, and it seems useful to ensure that the Forum has not stepped on toes or missed glaring issues with the previous ballot before we move to the next.

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 12:19 PM Doug Beattie via Servercert-wg <servercert-wg at cabforum.org<mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org>> wrote:
Ballot SC14: CAA Contact Property and Associated Phone Validation Methods

Purpose of Ballot: As discussed during the Validation Summit, Method 3 of the Baseline Requirements could use some improvements to close off some potential bad practices that might lead to security risks.  This Ballot tightens up the rules around phone validation in order to make sure domain authorization or control is verified with a person who is authorized to do so by introducing a replacement for Method 3.  Validations done under Method 3 will continue to be valid until the end of the data reuse period, but new phone based validations must use one of the new methods by the date specified in the ballot below.

This ballot also builds on “Ballot SC13: CAA Contact Property and Associated E-mail Validation Methods” to permit domain owners to publish Domain Validation phone numbers in DNS CAA and DNS TXT records.  Since these phone numbers are specifically for the purpose of validating domains, it’s not permissible to be transferred to a different number.

The following motion has been proposed by Doug Beattie of GlobalSign and endorsed by Bruce Morton of Entrust and Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert.
--- MOTION BEGINS ---
This ballot modifies the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates” as follows, based on Version 1.6.2 with ballot SC13 changes:

Add the following two definitions to section 1.6.1:

DNS CAA Phone Contact: The phone number defined in section B.1.2.

DNS TXT Record Phone Contact: The phone number defined in section B.2.2.

In section 1.6.1, change the section references for the definition of “DNS CAA Email Contact” from B.1.2 to B.1.1.

In section 1.6.1, change the section references for the definition of “DNS TXT Record Email Contact” from B.2.2 to B.2.1 respectively

In section 3.2.2.4.3, after the end of the second paragraph add the following text as a new paragraph: ”CAs SHALL NOT perform validations using this method after July 31, 2019.  Completed validations using this method SHALL continue to be valid for subsequent issuance per the applicable certificate data reuse periods.”


Add sections 3.2.2.4.15, 3.2.2.4.16, 3.2.2.4.17 as follows:

3.2.2.4.15 Phone Contact with Domain Contact

Confirm the Applicant's control over the FQDN by calling the Domain Contact’s phone number and obtain a confirming response to validate the ADN. Each phone call MAY confirm control of multiple ADNs provided that the same Domain Contact phone number is listed for each ADN being verified and they provide a confirming response for each ADN.

In the event that someone other than a Domain Contact is reached, the CA MAY request to be transferred to the Domain Contact.

In the event of reaching voicemail, the CA may leave the Random Value and the ADN(s) being validated.  The Domain Contact may return the Random Number to the CA via Phone, Email, Fax, or SMS to approve the request.

The Random Value SHALL remain valid for use in a confirming response for no more than 30 days from its creation. The CPS MAY specify a shorter validity period for Random Values.

Note: Once the FQDN has been validated using this method, the CA MAY also issue Certificates for other FQDNs that end with all the labels of the validated FQDN.  This method is suitable for validating Wildcard Domain Names.

3.2.2.4.16 Phone Contact with DNS CAA Phone Contact

Confirm the Applicant's control over the FQDN by calling the DNS CAA Phone Contact’s phone number and obtain a confirming response to validate the ADN. Each phone call MAY confirm control of multiple ADNs provided that the same DNS CAA Phone Contact phone number is listed for each ADN being verified and they provide a confirming response for each ADN.

The CA MAY NOT be transferred or request to be transferred as this phone number has been specifically listed for the purposes of Domain Validation.

In the event of reaching voicemail, the CA may leave the Random Value and the ADN(s) being validated.  The DNS CAA Phone Contact may return the Random Number to the CA via Phone, Email, Fax, or SMS to approve the request.

The Random Value SHALL remain valid for use in a confirming response for no more than 30 days from its creation. The CPS MAY specify a shorter validity period for Random Values.

Note: Once the FQDN has been validated using this method, the CA MAY also issue Certificates for other FQDNs that end with all the labels of the validated FQDN.  This method is suitable for validating Wildcard Domain Names.

3.2.2.4.17 Phone Contact with DNS TXT Record Phone Contact

Confirm the Applicant's control over the FQDN by calling the DNS TXT Record Phone Contact’s phone number and obtain a confirming response to validate the ADN. Each phone call MAY confirm control of multiple ADNs provided that the same DNS TXT Record Phone Contact phone number is listed for each ADN being verified and they provide a confirming response for each ADN.

The CA MAY NOT be transferred or request to be transferred as this phone number has been specifically listed for the purposes of Domain Validation.

In the event of reaching voicemail, the CA may leave the Random Value and the ADN(s) being validated.  The DNS TXT Record Contact may return the Random Number to the CA via Phone, Email, Fax, or SMS to approve the request.

The Random Value SHALL remain valid for use in a confirming response for no more than 30 days from its creation. The CPS MAY specify a shorter validity period for Random Values.

Note: Once the FQDN has been validated using this method, the CA MAY also issue Certificates for other FQDNs that end with all the labels of the validated FQDN.  This method is suitable for validating Wildcard Domain Names.


Add appendix sections B.1.2, B.2.2 as follows:

B.1.2. CAA contactphone Property
SYNTAX: contactemail <rfc3966 Global Number>

The CAA contactphone property takes a phone number as its parameter.  The entire parameter value of the MUST be a valid Global Number as defined in RFC 3966 section 5.1.4, or it cannot be used.  Global Numbers MUST have a preceding + and a country code and MAY contain visual separators.

The following is an example where the holder of the domain specified the contact property using a phone number.

$ORIGIN example.com<http://example.com>.
    CAA 0 contactphone "+1 (555) 123-4567"

The contactphone property MAY be critical if the domain owner does not want CAs who do not understand it to issue certificates for the domain.

B.2.2. DNS TXT Record Phone Contact

The DNS TXT record MUST be placed on the "_validation-contactphone" subdomain of the domain being validated.  The entire RDATA value of this TXT record MUST be a valid Global Number as defined in RFC 3966 section 5.1.4, or it cannot be used.


--- MOTION ENDS ---

*** WARNING ***: USE AT YOUR OWN RISK.  THE REDLINE BELOW IS NOT THE OFFICIAL VERSION OF THE CHANGES (CABF Bylaws, Section 2.4(a)):

A comparison of the changes can be found at: https://github.com/dougbeattie/documents/compare/master...dougbeattie:SC14---Phone-validation-updates


The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (7+ days)
Start Time: 2019-01-07 12:30 Eastern
End Time: Not before 2019-01-14 12:30 Eastern
Vote for approval (7 days)
Start Time: TBD
End Time: TBD



_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg at cabforum.org<mailto:Servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
http://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20190107/db21702a/attachment-0002.html>