[cabfpub] Ballot 207 - ASN.1 Jurisdiction in EV Guidelines
Moudrick M. Dadashov
md at ssc.lt
Mon Oct 23 05:39:12 UTC 2017
SSC votes: "Yes".
Thanks,
M.D.
On 10/23/2017 8:34 AM, Mads Egil Henriksveen via Public wrote:
>
> Buypass votes YES.
>
> Regards
>
> Mads
>
> *From:*Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Ben
> Wilson via Public
> *Sent:* mandag 9. oktober 2017 16:46
> *To:* CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* [cabfpub] Ballot 207 - ASN.1 Jurisdiction in EV Guidelines
>
> *Ballot 207 - ASN.1 Jurisdiction in EV Guidelines*
>
> This ballot clarifies the use of the ASN.1 Jurisdiction of
> incorporation field used in EV Certificates.
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Peter Bowen of Amazon and
> endorsed by Ben Wilson of DigiCert and Li Chun Chen of Chunghwa Telecom.
>
> -- MOTION BEGINS --
>
> In the EV Guidelines, Section 9.2.5 Subject Jurisdiction of
> Incorporation or Registration Field, under Certificate Fields, STRIKE
> "ASN.1 - X520LocalityName as specified in RFC 5280", "ASN.1 -
> X520StateOrProvinceName as specified in RFC 5280", and "ASN.1 –
> X520countryName as specified in RFC 5280" so that "Certificate Fields"
> reads:
>
> Certificate fields:
>
> Locality (if required):
>
> subject:jurisdictionLocalityName (OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.1)
>
> State or province (if required):
>
> subject:jurisdictionStateOrProvinceName (OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.2)
>
> Country:
>
> subject:jurisdictionCountryName (OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.3)
>
> In the EV Guidelines ADD an Appendix G that reads:
>
> Appendix G – Abstract Syntax Notation One module for EV certificates
>
> CABFSelectedAttributeTypes {joint‐iso‐itu‐t(2)
> international‐organizations(23) ca‐browser‐forum(140) module(4)
> cabfSelectedAttribute-Types(1) 1}
>
> DEFINITIONS ::=
>
> BEGIN
>
> -- EXPORTS All
>
> IMPORTS
>
> -- from Rec. ITU-T X.501 | ISO/IEC 9594-2 selectedAttributeTypes,
> ID, ldap-enterprise
>
> FROM UsefulDefinitions {joint-iso-itu-t ds(5) module(1)
> usefulDefinitions(0) 7}
>
> -- from the X.500 series ub-locality-name, ub-state-name
>
> FROM UpperBounds {joint-iso-itu-t ds(5) module(1)
> upperBounds(10) 7}
>
> -- from Rec. ITU-T X.520 | ISO/IEC 9594-6
>
> DirectoryString{}, CountryName
>
> FROM SelectedAttributeTypes selectedAttributeTypes;
>
> id-evat-jurisdiction ID ::= {ldap-enterprise 311 ev(60) 2 1}
>
> id-evat-jurisdiction-localityName ID ::= {id-evat-jurisdiction 1}
>
> id-evat-jurisdiction-stateOrProvinceName ID ::= {id-evat-jurisdiction 2}
>
> id-evat-jurisdiction-countryName ID ::= {id-evat-jurisdiction 3}
>
> jurisdictionLocalityName ATTRIBUTE ::= {
>
> SUBTYPE OF name
>
> WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString{ub-locality-name} LDAP-SYNTAX
> directoryString.&id LDAP-NAME {"jurisdictionL"} ID
> id-evat-jurisdiction-localityName }
>
> jurisdictionStateOrProvinceName ATTRIBUTE ::= {
>
> SUBTYPE OF name
>
> WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString{ub-state-name} LDAP-SYNTAX
> directoryString.&id LDAP-NAME {"jurisdictionST"} ID
> id-evat-jurisdiction-stateOrProvinceName }
>
> jurisdictionCountryName ATTRIBUTE ::= {
>
> SUBTYPE OF name
>
> WITH SYNTAX CountryName SINGLE VALUE TRUE LDAP-SYNTAX
> countryString.&id LDAP-NAME {"jurisdictionC"} ID
> id-evat-jurisdiction-countryName }
>
> END
>
> -- MOTION ENDS --
>
> The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot
> is as follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply
> with applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):
>
> BALLOT 207 Status: Final Maintenance Guideline Start time (22:00 UTC)
> End time (22:00 UTC)
>
> Discussion begins October 9, 2017 22:00 UTC and ends October 16, 2017
> 22:00 UTC (7 days)
>
> Vote for approval begins October 16, 2017 22:00 UTC and ends October
> 23, 2017 22:00 UTC (7 days)
>
> If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice)
> (30 days). If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded
> and PAG to be created. If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes
> effective at end of Review Period. Upon filing of Review Notice by
> Chair 30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
> From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final
> Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or
> comparison showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline
> section(s) intended to become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need
> not include a copy of the full set of guidelines. Such redline or
> comparison shall be made against the Final Guideline section(s) as
> they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need not take into
> consideration other ballots that may be proposed subsequently, except
> as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).
>
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the
> Public list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes'
> in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the
> response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the
> response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote
> received from any representative of a voting member before the close
> of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here:
> https://cabforum.org/members/
>
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes
> cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes
> cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is
> shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the
> required quorum number must participate in the ballot for the ballot
> to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20171023/552eb10d/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Public
mailing list