[cabfpub] Ballot 213 - Revocation Timeline Extension

[Gervase Markham]

On 11/10/17 15:42, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> The questions@ list doesn't suffer any of these problems. What makes you
> believe this is a reasonable conclusion to reach for a new list?

Just saying, if you are offering to moderate, my objection goes away :-)

> Your further reply again suggests there's some new set of requirements
> you feel are necessary and critical - that is, "if you can find someone
> to run it" - when the Forum itself has shown quite capable of running
> the questions@ list for such a purpose.

"The Forum" doesn't run anything. Individual people run things.

> I do hope you can recognize the inherent value in having such a
> vendor-neutral list, one which can allow the discovery of trends and
> patterns of issues in which the BRs may be either overly restrictive or
> insufficiently clear, in a way that the Forum itself can resolve those
> matters, rather than suggesting they must be 'laundered' to the Forum by
> some browser. 

Like I said, I won't vote against it unless you are doing the equivalent
of providing an unfunded mandate.

Gerv