[cabfpub] CT Policy moving to a new repository

[Ryan Sleevi]

That's probably better asked on the Chromium ct-policy list -
ct-policy at chromium.org

The current Chrome implementation is based on rounded down month
calculation, not days. In this case, if 825 days exceeds 27 months, then at
present, it would require 4 SCTs, not 3.

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Doug Beattie via Public <public at cabforum.org
> wrote:

> Hi Devon,
>
>
>
> Are you planning to change the 27-month references to 825 days at some
> point?  In some cases, 825 days might exceed 27 months but it’s our
> understanding that this would still only require 3 SCTs.
>
>
>
> Doug
>
>
>
> *From:* Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Devon
> O'Brien via Public
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 31, 2017 7:19 PM
> *To:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* [cabfpub] CT Policy moving to a new repository
>
>
>
> Hello CA/B Forum,
>
>
>
> In order to better align Google's github repositories, we have moved the
> Chromium CT Policy documentation to a new home within the /chromium repo.
>
>
>
> All existing links to the old repository (https://github.com/
> GoogleChrome/ct-policy) should now redirect to the new one (
> https://github.com/chromium/ct-policy)
>
>
>
> For your convenience, we've created a permanent short-link to the repo
> here:
>
> https://goo.gl/chrome/ct-policy
>
>
>
> We will also be updating all affected links on https://www.chromium.org/
> and https://www.certificate-transparency.org/ to the new shortened URL.
>
>
>
> I look forward to seeing those of you attending the CT Policy Days this
> week.
>
>
>
> -Devon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20171101/32ce24fa/attachment-0003.html>