[cabfpub] SFTP Port Removal ballot draft

[Ryan Sleevi]

Google endorses

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Gervase Markham via Public <
public at cabforum.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Here's a draft of the ballot to remove the SFTP port from Authorized
> Ports, as it appears that it's present due to a misunderstanding. Does it
> look OK? Can I get two endorsers?
>
> Gerv
>
>
> *Ballot XXX - SFTP Port Removal *
>
> *Purpose of Ballot: *It was reported to the CAB Forum Public Mailing List
> that:
>
> "Port 115 appears to be on this list [of authorized ports] in error,
> because this port number was assigned to an Internet protocol "Simple File
> Transfer Protocol"
> that never saw widespread use, it is not the correct port for the SFTP
> (SSH File Transfer Protocol) SSH subsystem of the SSH protocol which, like
> SSH itself, uses well-known port 22."
>
> Accordingly, this ballot removes that port from the list.
>
> -- MOTION BEGINS --
>
> Remove the following text from the definition of "Authorized Port" in
> section 1.6.1 of the Baseline Requirements:
>
> "115 (sftp), "
>
> -- MOTION ENDS --
>
>
>
> The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot is
> as follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply with
> applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):
>
>
>
> BALLOT XXX
>
> Status: Final Maintenance Guideline
>
> Start time (23:00 UTC)
>
> End time (23:00 UTC)
>
> Discussion (7 to 14 days)
>
> XXX
>
> XXX
>
> Vote for approval (7 days)
>
> XXX
>
> XXX
>
> If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (30
> days).
>
> If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to be
> created.
>
> If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of Review
> Period.
>
> Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
> 30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
>
>
> From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final
> Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or comparison
> showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to
> become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the
> full set of guidelines.  Such redline or comparison shall be made against
> the Final Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is
> proposed, and need not take into consideration other ballots that may be
> proposed subsequently, except as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).
>
>
>
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the
> Public list.  A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in
> the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A
> vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear
> responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any
> representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period
> will be counted. Voting members are listed here:
> https://cabforum.org/members/
>
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes
> cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast
> by members in the browser category must be in favor.  Quorum is shown on
> CA/Browser Forum wiki.  Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the required quorum
> number must participate in the ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by
> voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing listPublic at cabforum.orghttps://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170328/dec14a19/attachment-0003.html>