[cabfpub] Results on Ballot 187 - Make CAA Checking Mandatory

[Ryan Sleevi]

Fail to issue.

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Rick Andrews <Rick_Andrews at symantec.com>
wrote:

> But what am I supposed to do if I can’t parse the syntax?
>
>
>
> *From:* Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 17, 2017 10:22 AM
> *To:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Cc:* Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org>; Rick Andrews <
> Rick_Andrews at symantec.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Results on Ballot 187 - Make CAA Checking
> Mandatory
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Rick Andrews via Public <
> public at cabforum.org> wrote:
>
> Gerv, I would suggest simply removing "iodef" from "CAs MUST process the
> issue, issuewild, and iodef property tags". To me, the word "process" means
> to take some kind of action, as we must do with issue and issuewild tags.
> From what others have said, if the iodef record isn't marked critical, I
> can ignore it, and if it is marked critical, I can ignore it as long as I
> recognize it as an iodef record. I wouldn't call that "processing" the
> record.
>
>
>
> That's not quite correct. If it's marked critical, you must still
> understand how to parse the syntax, and ensure it is something you actively
> understand, even if you do not report.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170317/0b55755b/attachment-0003.html>