[cabfpub] Results on Ballot 187 - Make CAA Checking Mandatory
Ryan Sleevi
sleevi at google.com
Fri Mar 17 17:22:10 UTC 2017
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Rick Andrews via Public <
public at cabforum.org> wrote:
> Gerv, I would suggest simply removing "iodef" from "CAs MUST process the
> issue, issuewild, and iodef property tags". To me, the word "process" means
> to take some kind of action, as we must do with issue and issuewild tags.
> From what others have said, if the iodef record isn't marked critical, I
> can ignore it, and if it is marked critical, I can ignore it as long as I
> recognize it as an iodef record. I wouldn't call that "processing" the
> record.
>
That's not quite correct. If it's marked critical, you must still
understand how to parse the syntax, and ensure it is something you actively
understand, even if you do not report.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170317/28aee630/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Public
mailing list