[cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 193 - 825-day Certificate Lifetimes

Wed Mar 15 14:19:34 UTC 2017

Opera votes YES.

On 11 March 2017 at 18:20, Kirk Hall via Public <public at cabforum.org> wrote:

> Voting has started on  Ballot 193 - 825-day Certificate Lifetimes (shown
> below and attached).  Voting will end on Friday, March 17, 2017 at 23:00
> UTC.
>
>
>
> *********
>
>
>
> *Ballot 193 - 825-day Certificate Lifetimes (REVISED v2 – March 2, 2017)*
>
>
>
> *Purpose of Ballot:* Recent Ballot 185 demonstrated a consensus among
> Forum members to reduce the maximum lifetime for DV and OV certificates
> from 39 months to 825 days (roughly 27 months).  This ballot reflects that
> consensus, and also reduces the maximum period for reuse of vetting data
> for DV and OV certificates from 39 months to 27 months.
>
>
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Chris Bailey of Entrust Datacard
> and endorsed by the following CA/B Forum member representatives (listed in
> alphabetical order) Robin Alden of Comodo, Ben Wilson of DigiCert, and Doug
> Beattie of GlobalSign to introduce new Final Maintenance Guidelines for the
> "Baseline Requirements Certificate Policy for the Issuance and Management
> of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" (Baseline Requirements) and the
> "Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of Extended Validation
> Certificates" (EV Guidelines).
>
>
>
> -- MOTION BEGINS --
>
>
>
> *BR 4.2.1. Performing Identification and Authentication Functions*
>
>
>
> The certificate request MAY include all factual information about the
> Applicant to be included in the Certificate, and such additional
> information as is necessary for the CA to obtain from the Applicant in
> order to comply with these Requirements and the CA’s Certificate Policy
> and/or Certification Practice Statement. In cases where the certificate
> request does not contain all the necessary information about the Applicant,
> the CA SHALL obtain the remaining information from the Applicant or, having
> obtained it from a reliable, independent, third‐party data source, confirm
> it with the Applicant. The CA SHALL establish and follow a documented
> procedure for verifying all data requested for inclusion in the Certificate
> by the Applicant.
>
>
>
> Applicant information MUST include, but not be limited to, at least one
> Fully‐Qualified Domain Name or IP address to be included in the
> Certificate’s SubjectAltName extension.
>
>
>
> Section 6.3.2 limits the validity period of Subscriber Certificates. The
> CA MAY use the documents and data provided in Section 3.2 to verify
> certificate information, provided that the CA obtained the data or document
> from a source specified under Section 3.2 no more than *825 days **thirty‐nine
> (39) months* prior to issuing the Certificate.
>
>
>
> The CA SHALL develop, maintain, and implement documented procedures that
> identify and require additional verification activity for High Risk
> Certificate Requests prior to the Certificate’s approval, as reasonably
> necessary to ensure that such requests are properly verified under these
> Requirements.
>
>
>
> If a Delegated Third Party fulfills any of the CA’s obligations under this
> section, the CA SHALL verify that the process used by the Delegated Third
> Party to identify and further verify High Risk Certificate Requests
> provides at least the same level of assurance as the CA’s own processes.
>
>
>
> *BR 6.3.2. Certificate Operational Periods and Key Pair Usage Periods*
>
>
>
> Subscriber Certificates issued after *March 1, 2018 **the Effective Date*
> MUST have a Validity Period no greater than *825 days **60 months*.  *Subscriber
> Certificates issued after 1 July 2016 April 2015 but prior to 1 March 2018
> MUST NOT have a Validity Period no greater than thirty-nine (39) months.*
>
>
>
> *Except as provided for below, Subscriber Certificates issued after 1
> April 2015 MUST have a Validity Period no greater than 39 months.*
>
>
>
> *Until 30 June 2016, CAs MAY continue to issue Subscriber Certificates
> with a Validity Period greater than 39 months but not greater than 60
> months provided that the CA documents that the Certificate is for a system
> or software that:*
>
>
>
> *(a) was in use prior to the Effective Date;*
>
> *(b) is currently in use by either the Applicant or a substantial number
> of Relying Parties;*
>
> *(c) fails to operate if the Validity Period is shorter than 60 months;*
>
> *(d) does not contain known security risks to Relying Parties; and*
>
> *(e) is difficult to patch or replace without substantial economic outlay.*
>
>
>
> *EVGL 9.4. Maximum Validity Period For EV Certificate*
>
> The validity period for an EV Certificate SHALL NOT exceed *825 days* *twenty
> seven months*. It is RECOMMENDED that EV Subscriber Certificates have a
> maximum validity period of twelve months.
>
>
>
>
>
> -- MOTION ENDS --
>
>
>
> The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot is
> as follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply with
> applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):
>
>
>
> BALLOT 193
>
> Status: Final Maintenance Guideline
>
> Start time (23:00 UTC)
>
> End time (23:00 UTC)
>
> Discussion (7 to 14 days)
>
> March 3
>
> March 10
>
> Vote for approval (7 days)
>
> March 10
>
> March 17
>
> If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (30
> days).
>
> If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to be
> created.
>
> If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of Review
> Period.
>
> Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
> 30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
>
>
> From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final
> Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or comparison
> showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to
> become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the
> full set of guidelines.  Such redline or comparison shall be made against
> the Final Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is
> proposed, and need not take into consideration other ballots that may be
> proposed subsequently, except as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).
>
>
>
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the
> Public list.  A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in
> the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A
> vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear
> responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any
> representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period
> will be counted. Voting members are listed here:
> https://cabforum.org/members/
>
>
>
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes
> cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast
> by members in the browser category must be in favor.  Quorum is shown on
> CA/Browser Forum wiki.  Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the required quorum
> number must participate in the ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by
> voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>

-- 
Michael Markevich
Head of Security and Privacy
Opera Software
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170315/d14012e7/attachment-0002.html>