[cabfpub] Random value reuse

[Gervase Markham]

On 28/07/17 14:53, Jeremy Rowley via Public wrote:
> I think the random value should be tied to a single communication
> without reuse.  For example, a single email sent to the constructed
> emails, a single API call, a single phone call, etc.  The random value
> shouldn’t be tied to a method, but should be tied to a specific
> communication from the CA that is tied to a request. By getting rid of
> the reuse language, we can simplify the process and eliminate the risk
> associated with reuse.

Right. New random values are cheap :-)

Gerv