[cabfpub] Updated Ballot 190 v5 dated July 6, 2017

[Gervase Markham]

On 06/07/17 20:28, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote:
> 2) At least one member highlighted that the Validation WG, with the
> proposal of Ballot 169, spent considerable time trying to address the
> ambiguity problem that the "Note" is trying to address (but does so
> incompletely).

As the person who suggested it, I am happy for this note to be removed.
I agree we can resolve any ambiguity it attempts to resolve, in a
separate ballot.

With that change, v5 seems fine to me.

Gerv