[cabfpub] Proposed Ballot 183 - Allowing 822 Names and (limited) otherNames

[Rob Stradling]

On 09/01/17 17:39, Rich Smith via Public wrote:
<snip>
> Scenario:
> We ignore this and Ryan's arguments against, and we pass this proposal.
> Next month we decide that the various browsers all now have enough
> support for critical name constraints to update the BRs to MUST, but
> because it will break your newly authorized dual-use certs Digicert is
> now arguing against bringing the BRs back into full compliance w/RFC5280.

Geoff,

Would you (or anyone else from Apple) be able to provide CABForum with 
data on the % of currently deployed Apple devices that support critical 
name constraints?

Thanks.

-- 
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online