[cabfpub] F2F topic proposal - future thoughts

Gervase Markham gerv at mozilla.org
Fri Feb 10 08:57:59 UTC 2017

On 10/02/17 05:13, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote:
> However, one minor note, it's unclear how you might propose to capture
> sufficient information so it's ambiguous as to who suggested it - that
> is, achieving the property the card introduces, of masking who suggests
> what.

I think perhaps this issue can be mitigated by having people know that
this process is coming up, and consider the wording of their cards
carefully with their colleagues beforehand, with this potential issue in

Another option would be to have one trusted person (one of the auditors?
:-) who received all the cards at the start of the day with names on,
sought any necessary clarifications, and then read them out (without
reading the names) in a session near the end of the day.


More information about the Public mailing list