[cabfpub] Draft Ballot 185 - Limiting the Lifetime of Certificates: User input

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Thu Feb 9 21:24:24 UTC 2017


Parkinson's Law of Triviality

Since we're still discussing this, can you explain why you believe those
two days would or should be sufficient, on their own merits, to cause a
"Yes" to be a "No" or a "No" to be a "Yes"

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Scott Rea <scott at scottrea.com> wrote:

> What is wrong with 400 days instead of 398 Ryan?
>
> Regards,
> -Scott
>
> Snip...
>
> On Feb 9, 2017 12:45 PM, "Ryan Sleevi via Public" <public at cabforum.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> What would the world look like if we had required 398 day (nee 13 month)
> certificates from the get-go?
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170209/31499923/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Public mailing list