gerv at mozilla.org
Sun Feb 5 20:51:21 UTC 2017
On 05/02/17 20:32, Kirk Hall wrote:
> Gerv - can't machines be programmed to notice that April 18, 2017 is
> 13 months after March 18, 2016?
Yes, they can, most easily by subtracting one date from the other,
getting a number of days, and comparing that to a number of days
representing "13 months". All this proposal is, is to set that figure to
a figure which is at least 13 months in all possible scenarios, i.e. 398.
> It seems easy to do that, and much
> easier for humans to evaluate than 398 days.
Like I said, specify it as "398 days (just over 13 months)". There is
then a human way and a computer way of evaluating it, and everyone's happy.
But anyway, how it's specified will be up to the motion drafter, and we
can bikeshed it then.
More information about the Public