[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: ]RE: Ballot 194 - Effective Date of Ballot 193 Provisions is in the VOTING period (ends April 16)

[Ryan Sleevi]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com> wrote:
>
> Ryan,
>
> Am I understanding correctly that Google’s concern is that the ambiguity
> of whether this ballot had the proper majority required could result in a
> member with Essential Claims privately determining that the ballot did not
> pass, that the initiation of the Review period was therefore illegitimate,
> and therefore the license required by the IPR agreement does not apply?
>

Yes, both for this Ballot and, in applying the definition used here as
accepted precedent, for conducting future Ballots (and IP exclusions) in a
manner that would directly put members at risk.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170418/85fbc2be/attachment-0003.html>