[cabfpub] SHA-1 exception request

Dean Coclin Dean_Coclin at symantec.com
Wed Oct 19 00:49:47 UTC 2016

Given that this “redo” is not specifically covered in the original procedure (other than a mention to “re-apply” which isn’t specific), would Mozilla and Google consider a shorter time period for cryptanalysis given the rest of the discussion has occurred? Perhaps 3-4 days?





From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 4:36 PM
To: Dean Coclin <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com>
Cc: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling at comodo.com>; Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org>; CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>; Halliday, Morgan <Morgan.Halliday at firstdata.com>; Sidoriak, Evan S <Evan.Sidoriak at firstdata.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] SHA-1 exception request



On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Dean Coclin via Public <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org> > wrote:

While I'm not the technical expert here, assuming we could, wouldn't they
then need to undergo the 10 day eval period?




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20161019/e86f7e4f/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5723 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20161019/e86f7e4f/attachment-0001.p7s>

More information about the Public mailing list