[cabfpub] Potential F2F Topics

Peter Bowen pzb at amzn.com
Mon Oct 3 14:52:19 UTC 2016

> On Oct 3, 2016, at 7:26 AM, Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org> wrote:
> It's good that we now have an established practice of nominating
> discussion leaders for each slot. It would be good if the discussion
> leader for each slot could, _before_ we assemble, state in a couple of
> sentences what the goal of that slot is. If the chairman could perhaps
> try and elicit such statements from the relevant people, I feel sure
> that would enhance our efficiency.
> I would also note that there is currently an item on the agenda
> "Potential change to browser UI for Subject DN". It is a long-accepted
> truth that the CAB Forum does not place requirements on browser UI. It
> may be worth making that clear again now, so that we can use that time
> for other items.

Before trying to shoot down any discussion, how about we have the proposed leader send an abstract to the list on the topic to see if there is interest?  It is possible that it could morph into a useful discussion.


More information about the Public mailing list