[cabfpub] Notice of Certificate Issuance

[Gervase Markham]

On 30/11/16 00:31, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote:
> I have a few questions related to this - both related to the specific
> instance, but also the general question of what can we, as the Forum, do
> better.

These are all excellent questions.

> 3) Symantec is 'notable' for its continued attempts to view misissuance
> as exceptional. This is true regarding SHA-1 sunsetting (and the
> subsequent exception process developed), it's true in this case, and
> it's true in past instances as well (such as Pitney Bowes
> - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966350 ). 

Hmm. I note that Rick never responded to my question there about why
this cert had a "BR compliant" OID inserted...

Gerv