[cabfpub] Ballot process proposal

[Gervase Markham]

On 17/11/16 21:40, Geoff Keating via Public wrote:
> This is a good policy as far as it goes, but it seems to omit the
> role of the PAG, which might look at the exclusion notices and
> determine that they don’t really apply, are not significant for most
> members, or similar.  My suggestion would be to add:
<snip>

I should have read the whole thread before replying! Great minds...

Gerv