[cabfpub] Ballot 170 voting results
Dean_Coclin at symantec.com
Tue Jun 21 15:34:33 UTC 2016
Yes, I had put a slot on this week's agenda to try and come to some agreement
on this although the total time allotted probably won't suffice. But at least
we can kick off a discussion. In addition, I would suggest that Ben invite
some of the folks that voted NO to join the next PWG call next week and
solicit their feedback.
From: Gervase Markham [mailto:gerv at mozilla.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 10:42 AM
To: Dean Coclin <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com>; CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 170 voting results
On 17/06/16 19:45, Dean Coclin wrote:
> From the CAs, we received 11 YES votes, 0 NO votes and 1 Abstention
> From the Browsers, we received 2 YES votes, 2 NO votes and 0 Abstentions.
> Therefore the ballot fails.
I'm sure this must be frustrating for those in the Policy Group who have
worked on this ballot. Therefore, I do think we need to figure out some way to
come to an agreement on the general scope of the BRs before more work is done,
to avoid this outcome in future. Dean: as chair, do you have suggestions for
the best way to have that discussion?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5723 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Public